The real total cost of ownership (TCO) of Networking software includes the software license, subscription fees, software training, customizations, hardware (if needed), maintenance and support and other related services. Who is more expensive? TightVNC or NoMachine?

NoMachine: Since its official launch onto the market in February 2003 NoMachine has establised itself as the choice in the Enterprise's decision for remote access and terminal services in its migration to the Linux platform. His extensions provide for 'tight encoding', which improves performance over low bandwidth connections. TightVNC Software: TightVNC is a cross-platform open source remote desktop software application that uses and extends VNC's RFB protocol to control another computer's screen remotely. In this article we compare between the two software products: TightVNC Software Vs. Looking for the right Networking solution for your business? Buyers are primarily concerned about the real total cost of implementation (TCO), the full list of features, vendor reliability, user reviews, and the pros and cons. Both tools offer the same amount of features. TightVNC is more expensive to implement (TCO) than NoMachine, and TightVNC is rated higher (72/100) than NoMachine (57/100). CoConstructīottom Line: Which is Better - TightVNC or NoMachine? x11vnc might also need a physical display. I tried x11vnc but have not succeeded and I have an unanswered problem for this method. If my understanding is correct, a cloud server from linode has no physical desktop provided to the customer so nomachine is recommending the paid-for product. If you need to create virtual desktops on demand, want to limit the logins to SSH, or are using NIS, Kerberos or other enterprise server functionalities, you need one of the NoMachine Enterprise server products'. I considered nomachine's free edition but their website says that 'the free NoMachine 4 is designed to work the same across Windows, Mac and Linux and give users access to the physical desktop of the remote computer. The bug is unacceptably slow performance after a few hours of use. I have an outstanding bug reported for x2go and 12.04 so I'm hesitant to use it with 14.04. I ran with 12.04 and tightvnc successfully for about 2 years. I've tried tightvnc but get a grey screen with the identical setup I used to use with 12.04. Doing some trial and error :( on a linode.

Vnc vs nomachine